bq. Respondent maintains that it is a cat, that is, a well-known carnivorous quadruped which has long been domesticated. However, it is equally well-known that the common cat, whose scientific name is Felis domesticus, cannot speak or read or write. Thus, a common cat could not have submitted the Response (or even have registered the disputed domain name). Therefore, either Respondent is a different species of cat, such as the one that stars in the motion picture Cat From Outer Space, or Respondents assertion regarding its being a cat is incorrect.
Via Markenblog
Elsewhere, on dogs in Austria, Juristisches und Sonstiges, from Der Kurier.
I suppose one could compare the language in Austrian and English courts here, although the Austrian language did not come from the judge.
>>but the local pharmacist’s window suggests otherwise
It’s fun picking out the worst, though. And I don’t think sales are doing that well.
I must admit I was tempted by the football ‘advent calendar’ where you take out and eat a chocolate (football?) for every team that leaves the competition.
>>I must admit I was tempted by the football ‘advent calendar’ where you take out and eat a chocolate (football?) for every team that leaves the competition>
Now that sounds like the first sensible “World Cup (un)related” product I’ve heard of … Unfortunately my chocolate consumption has had to drop since I developed diabetes Type B …. I envy you…
Paul
I’m sorry to hear that, Paul. However, I am going easy on the chocolate too.