It’s worth looking at point 38 of the complaint.
Mummy (a retired schoolteacher) is a co-plaintiff and claims that she suffered “significant economic, emotional and reputational damages, as well as a significant disruption in retirement and life plan”.
In the comments on the Wall Street Journal site it is suggested that there were good reasons to dismiss the fellow, but nobody is willing to say what they were.
Yes, of course there was more to it – and less to it – than the typing story, but that seems more striking.
My Google ads are giving me too many Zachs, as opposed to Zacks.
.. showing inveterate football fan Henry suitably kitted out in a F
It’s worth looking at point 38 of the complaint.
Mummy (a retired schoolteacher) is a co-plaintiff and claims that she suffered “significant economic, emotional and reputational damages, as well as a significant disruption in retirement and life plan”.
In the comments on the Wall Street Journal site it is suggested that there were good reasons to dismiss the fellow, but nobody is willing to say what they were.
Yes, of course there was more to it – and less to it – than the typing story, but that seems more striking.
My Google ads are giving me too many Zachs, as opposed to Zacks.