Unauthorized use of titles/Ermittlungen gegen Gebrauch eines US-Doktortitels

There’s been some excitement in the press about criminal investigation proceedings against some highly qualified Americans at the Max Planck Institute in Jena and elsewhere. They had the temerity to describe themselves as Dr. and Professor Dr. But in Germany, you can use Dr. as part of your name only if the doctorate is German.

What academic titles one can bear is governed by Land law. When I started teaching at a Bavarian Fachakademie in 1982, I was not allowed to call myself Frau Dr. Marks, although this did not stop my employer doing so. I was not even allowed to write Ph.D. after my name – I would have had to pay a sum of 83 DM, I think it was, to be allowed to do so. I may have broken this rule, because I certainly didn’t pay the money. I don’t know what the penalties were, but it was a matter of administrative law as far as I was concerned.

In recent years, the situation has been relaxed for EU citizens. I suppose Germany was forced to grant reciprocity. I was still told I might call myself Frau Dr. (London) Marks. Doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue, does it?

The Kultusministerium used to write to a British fellow-examiner, who was employed at the FIM Fachakademie in Munich, as Herr Dr. X. One day I found out while chatting to him on the phone that his Ph.D. was from Oxford! This was before the EU relaxation. Shortly afterwards I was able to leverage the forbidden title out of the Kultusministerium after I wrote them a letter (they had curtly told my school principal a few years before that a Kultusministerium cannot call a foreigner Dr.).

Anyway, the hoo-hah now relates to Americans and to section 132a of the German Criminal Code, which imposes a sentence of up to one year’s imprisonment or a fine on those who use German or foreign titles without authorization. § 132a German § 132a English.

The main purpose of this section is apparently to protect the general public against those falsely claiming expertise. Using the title on one’s business card is evidence, but I presume that if the person does not normally act in a manner likely to damage the public, the charges will be dropped.

See article in the Washington Post, Non-European PhDs In Germany Find Use Of ‘Doktor’ Verboten.

Ian Thomas Baldwin, a Cornell-educated researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Jena, has stopped calling himself “Dr.” ever since he was summoned for interrogation by police two months ago on suspicion of “title abuse.”
“Coming from the States, I had assumed that when you get a letter from the criminal police, you’ve either murdered someone or embezzled something or done something serious,” said Baldwin, a molecular ecologist. “It is absurd. It’s totally absurd.”

Der Spiegel has the story in German.

In der Tat hatte sich der Amerikaner auf Visitenkarten, Briefpapier und der Internet-Präsenz seines Instituts als “Prof. Dr. Ian Baldwin” bezeichnet. Das hatte sich Baldwin so angewöhnt, weil ihn seine deutschen Kollegen exakt so angeschrieben hatten. An “Professor Dr. Ian T. Baldwin” etwa war der Brief adressiert, mit dem die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft ihren Neuzugang 1996 herzlich begrüßt hatte, einen von gleich drei Amerikanern, die sie für Jena gewinnen konnte. Auch Einladungen zu Vorträgen an Universitäten ergingen immer an den “Prof. Dr.”.

Der Spiegel says that the problem has probably been caused by a frustrated foreigner who is not allowed to call himself Dr. in Germany and who is taking his revenge by reporting Max Planck Institute scientists who do this to the police, who are then happy to pursue the complaints.

LATER NOTE: there are at present 77 comments on the Washington Post article. There are some wonderfully ignorant and ranting remarks: the term ‘reichsanwalt’ contributed by someone in Munich with a law degree, the suggestion that Germany only became a nation in the 1930s, the view that fascism has reigned in Europe since the Roman Empire and the EU was the first step towards ‘the end’, and ‘The Germans have been causing trouble as far back as the Goths’. Also some good sense on § 132 from Robert Gellately. Great irritation at Germany being the only country in the world to require a licence to play golf. And ‘not all bad, puts Condi Rice down a couple of pegs. Univ. of Denver prob wont even make the 200 school list when they relax the law.’

Via German American Law Journal blog, which points out that the press will have a wonderful anti-German field day with this.

Interviews with Supreme Court Justices/Video-Interviews mit US Supreme-Court-Richtern

At LawProse, Inc.

In 2006-2007, Bryan Garner interviewed eight of the nine Justices about legal writing and advocacy. These are the complete interviews. Because the files are large, the videos may take a few moments to start playing.

LawProse is making these interviews available as a public service. Anyone may freely use these videos for educational purposes, with appropriate attribution to Bryan Garner or LawProse.

(Via The Illinois Trial Practice Weblog)

No beer for judge/Amtsrichter darf im Gerichtsgebäude kein Bier trinken

Fürther Nachrichten reports that the local court judge (Amtsrichter) Werner Schultheiß, who is retiring on April 1, would like to drink beer with his colleagues. Those in charge are not prepared to relax the total ban on alcohol in the Fürth Amtsgericht building, so he is going to court – to the administrative court in Ansbach, where the case will be heard on March 20.

Zum Abschied will Werner Schultheiß (64), Amtsrichter in Fürth, der am 1. April in Pension geht, nicht nur leise Servus sagen, sondern auch mit den Kollegen anstoßen. Das darf er gerne tun – solange in den Gläsern Wasser oder Limo schwappt. Alkohol ist in den Räumen des Amtsgerichts nämlich tabu. Dagegen hat der streitbare Richter Klage eingelegt.

Am 20. März steht nun vor dem Verwaltungsgericht in Ansbach die Verhandlung «gegen den Freistaat Bayern wegen Hausrecht« auf der Tagesordnung. Mit einem Antrag auf eine einstweilige Anordnung will Schultheiß, der am Registergericht tätig ist, ein «Biergebot« durchsetzen.

New fountain/Neuer Brunnen, Billinganlage

Die Fürther Stadtwerke – infra – testet den neuen Brunnen.

I think I was quicker than the local paper this time.

LATER NOTE: no, the local paper was there this morning. I only saw one figure yesterday, but the rest must have appeared in the course of the day. Looking at the last picture there, I realize I must have spoken to the artist, Karl-Heinz Richter from Chemnitz. It was OK that I praised the figures, then, but perhaps less so that I added, ‘bis sie besprüht werden’ (until someone sprays paint on them). Still, I read that they can be reproduced.

Richters lebensgroße Figuren bestehen aus Glasfaser-Kunststoff mit einem Stahlskelett. Ein Jahr lang hat der Chemnitzer daran gearbeitet. Wichtig war dem gelernten Porzellanformer die farbige Gestaltung. Damit soll der Eintönigkeit des Sitzrondells entgegengewirkt werden. Nach Einbruch der Dunkelheit werden die Figuren bis 22 Uhr beleuchtet. Der Vorteil des Materials: bei Beschädigungen können die Skulpturen mit den vorhandenen Formen problemlos reproduziert werden.

Link: Karl-Heinz Richter

Above all/Über alles

The Air Force Academy has taken the motto Above All.

“‘Above All’ is about what we do and how we do it,” Colonel Caldwell said. “The job of the Air Force is to defend America and we do that by dominating air, space and cyberspace. The new campaign and slogan captures our roots, but also illustrates where we’re going as a service as the Air Force prepares to contend with future threats.”

I certainly wasn’t aware the U.S. Air Force dominated cyberspace, but I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised.

I must say I prefer Per ardua ad astra, but I don’t understand the excitement about a supposed borrowing from Deutschland über Alles. I just can’t see that. The actual use of the word cyberspace looks more foolish to me. See comments to tongodeon’s Live Journal entry, and also the comments at Boing Boing.

Automatic recording of car number plates unconstitutional/BVerfG zur automatisierten Erfassung von Kfz-Kennzeichen nichtig

The Federal Constitutional Court held today that the automated recording of car number plates as laid down in police regulations in Hessen and Schleswig-Holstein is unconstitutional. It infringes the complainants’ general right of personality as manifested in the basic right to informational self-determination:

Die Verfassungsbeschwerden mehrerer Kraftfahrzeughalter gegen polizeirechtliche Vorschriften in Hessen und Schleswig-Holstein, die zur automatisierten Erfassung der amtlichen Kfz-Kennzeichen ermächtigen (vgl. Pressemitteilung Nr. 94 vom 27. September 2007), waren erfolgreich. Der Erste Senat des Bundesverfassungsgerichts hat mit Urteil vom 11. März 2008 die angegriffenen Vorschriften für nichtig erklärt, da sie das allgemeine Persönlichkeitsrecht der Beschwerdeführer in seiner Ausprägung als Grundrecht auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung verletzen.

I suppose it’s OK if I record one or two. Visitors from Tübingen: