In the last entry I quoted Lister/Veth’s entry on fortgesetzte Handlung:
continuous act /offence (UK) / offense (US); several acts or offences of the same nature viewed as a single act by the law
Adrian made a number of comments: that the term is in Köbler’s equally cheap dictionary; that (in Lister/Veth, I think he meant) it is given only as a criminal-law term and not in the form Fortsetzungshandlung; that a colleague was slammed by an Austrian-German law firm in London many years ago for using continuous offence, and that one possible translation would use the term nexus – I’ll quote the comment:
Eng. criminal law – or rather the Indictment Rules – talk of ‘(sequential) nexus of (serially) related offences’ for joint as opposed to separate or several indictment.
Name-dropping again, I would mention Sir Ivan Lawrence QC who developed the ‘nexus’ theory in the notorious 1960’s Kray Twins’ murder trial.
This raises a large number of points. In fact, I doubt I will ever achieve the brevity that is so often advised for weblogs. Continue reading