Personality test / Persönlichkeitstest

My Personality

Neuroticism
89
Extraversion
0
Openness To Experience
60
Agreeableness
1
Conscientiousness
12

You are introverted, reserved, and quiet with a preference for solitude and solitary activities. Your socializing tends to be restricted to a few close friends. You can be very easily upset, even by what most people consider the normal demands of living. People consider you to be extremely sensitive and emotional. A desire for tradition does not prevent you from trying new things. Your thinking is neither simple nor complex. To others you appear to be a well-educated person but not an intellectual. People see you as tough, critical, and uncompromising and you have less concern with others’ needs than with your own. You like to live for the moment and do what feels good now. Your work tends to be careless and disorganized.

Test Yourself Compare Yourself View Full Report

I got this test via Larko. Like him, I dispute the last sentence, and I also dispute the fourth (‘People consider you to be …’)

German language and Wikipedia/Vereine

Deutsche Sprachwelt reports that the German Wikipedia is in the process of purging a large number of articles, mainly on associations for the preservation of standards in the German language:

Bereits gelöscht sind Lexikonartikel über den „Tag der deutschen Sprache“, die „Theo-Münch-Stiftung der Deutschen Sprache“ oder die „Liste der Druckmedien in alter Rechtschreibung“. In einem Löschverfahren – der Vorstufe zur Löschung – befinden sich gegenwärtig zum Beispiel Artikel über die „Stiftung Deutsche Sprache“, die „Henning-Kaufmann-Stiftung zur Pflege der Reinheit der deutschen Sprache“, den „Verein für deutsche Rechtschreibung und Sprachpflege“, das „Netzwerk Deutsche Sprache“, den „Deutschen Sprachrat“, den Verein „Rat für deutsche Rechtschreibung“ oder den „Redaktionsstab der Gesellschaft für deutsche Sprache e.V. beim Deutschen Bundestag“. Auch der Eintrag über den „Verein für Sprachpflege“, der die DEUTSCHE SPRACHWELT herausgibt, ist betroffen. Daneben sind zahlreiche Artikel zur Plansprache Esperanto von der Löschung bedroht.

Who says Germans don’t like forming associations?

Via OnzeTaal

Internet newsletter for lawyers/Internet-Newsletter für Juristen

Delia Venables’ Internet Newsletter for Lawyers has a new look and is now produced jointly with Nick Holmes of infolaw.
It costs money, so many readers will say there is enough to read out there. However, it’s always excellent and now it has the advantage that a glimpse of the contents can be seen by non-lawyers.

An article on Web 2.0 mentioned The Legal Scholarship Network, actually part of the Social Science Research Network (that is, there is not just law there, but several subject areas).

The Legal Scholarship Network, a joint project hosted by Stanford Law School and the European Corporate Governance Institute, provides an open facility to upload and catalogue legal research and position papers on legislation and other issues. Currently the site holds more than 75,000 papers. There have been almost 10 million downloads to date. Clearly there is a demand for collaborative expertise and perhaps this is how Web 2.0 may be used by lawyers.

I downloaded a couple of papers, including Hill, Claire A. and King, Christopher, “How Do German Contracts Do As Much With Fewer Words?” . Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 79, p. 889, 2004 Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=596668.

This paper presents quite a positive view of German contracts in contrast with American, and to some extent also English, contracts:

Contrast these two standard forms of a forum selection clause:
• American Clause: The exclusive forum for the resolution of any dispute under or arising out of this agreement shall be the courts of general jurisdiction of ___ and both parties submit to the jurisdiction of such courts. The parties waive all objections to such forum based on forum non conveniens.
• German Clause: Ausschließlicher Gerichtsstand ist ___.
Contrast these two boilerplate phrases:
• American clause: including but not limited to.
• German Clause: insbesondere.
Contrast these two clauses on scope of agency:
• English Clause: The [Agent] agrees that the [Principal] shall at its sole discretion be able to accept or reject any order obtained by the [Agent] for any reason including poor credit rating of the client, bad payment record,
unavailability of materials or textiles, [and] conflict of interest with existing clients. The [Agent] shall not be entitled to receive any payment for any order so rejected.
• German Clause: Es steht dem Unternehmer frei, ein vom Handelsvertreter vermitteltes Geschäft anzuschließen oder abzulehnen.

38 pages of discussion of differences and their sources and effects. Some of what a search on ‘German law’ threw up.

Family law / Familienrecht

Four UK blogs on family law now (I think Nick Holmes pointed this out recently). Jacquig is a family law barrister who tries to explain things to laypersons, with an emphasis on practical advice, and also has a wiki including a JargonBuster.

SpainWilliams llp is a small law firm’s website done entirely on Typepad. This might interest some translators as a method of creating a website from blogging software. The blog is Family Law Matters. Here’s an entry on how to dissolve a civil partnership (Lebenspartnerschaft): just like divorce apart from adultery.

Meanwhile, Boing Boing links to advice for divorcing men in New Zealand who want to keep their Meccano. Some of the advice is familiar and could be useful even outside the field of Meccano:

Claim everything of the spouse’s as a bargaining chip even if you don’t want it including half of the shoes (the left foot ones J ).

This reminds me of when my family were looking at houses in England thirty years ago and one belonged to a couple going through divorce. It had a whole room full of working Meccano, but the wife didn’t seem interested in talking about it.