Fan mail/Leserreaktionen

I remember making fun of Lidl’s British Week in Germany, but can’t remember actually making a recommendation. Still, I seem to have put someone’s back up:

HATERWORDS*SALT AND VINEGRE STICKS*EX LIDL

Englaender sind ja bekannt, dass diese weder kochen koennen , noch von kueche etwas
verstehen. Alles fuer den SCHWEINETROG

Haette ich wissen muessen, als ich mir diesen Dreck bei Lidl gekauft habe.

Schde um die 2 eur….was fuer ein schweinedreck. igitt und ab in die muelltonne
adios

It couldn’t have happened to a more deserving person. Could it have been a lawyer? The first word of the header is a variation on Hatherwoods.

Actually, I do think crisps already impregnated with vinegar taste very strange. In my youth we used to get the little bag of salt in blue paper to put on them, but nowadays all the flavourings are added in advance.

A book you can read only once (whether you hate it or not)/Ein Buch, das du nur einmal lesen kannst (egal, ob du es hasst oder nicht)

This is ridiculous. I already said some books I could read again, so the rest are the ones I won’t read again.

The most likely category are potboiler crime novels, which I have read a lot of but not recently. And I don’t have too many of them left on my shelves. I have been known to read Ruth Rendell, and I liked the Barbara Vine novels, at least those I read. I have read P.D. James but liked it less. Also Ian Rankin, Sue Grafton, Sarah Paretsky. And whoever wrote Bella Block, before Bella Block became Hannelore Hoger. I have found one of the spook Minni Mann series by Helmut Zenker, Die Mann ist tot und lässt Sie grüßen, which has a touch of Müllers Büro about it. Maybe I could read that again. But these are mostly page turners, and when I know the story I won’t enjoy the book on a second reading.

Google and the EPO/Google und das EPA

The EPO announced on November 30 that it is going to collaborate with Google:

The EPO and Google have today signed a Memorandum of Understanding to improve access to patent translations in multiple languages.

Under the agreement, the EPO will use Google’s machine translation technology to translate patents into the languages of the 38 countries that it serves. In return, it will provide Google with access to its translated patents, enabling Google to optimise its machine translation technology. Google technology will be used to translate patents originating in Europe as well as patents originating in other regions of the world and enjoying protection in Europe.

Exactly how the MT will be used is not clear from this announcement. It’s clear that patents can’t be translated by MT, but rough-and-ready translations which give the gist might be useful when it comes to searching lots of patents and seeing which might be worth investigating further.

I don’t translate patents. Although the legal and language aspects interest me, the technical knowledge is beyond me. But I know they can’t be translated by Google’s online MT.

The matter was discussed by Dave Grunwald on the GTS Blog and more positively by Renato Beninatto.

(Thanks to Karen for reminding me of this)