When I was reading JuraBlogs (shows the newsfeeds of German legal weblogs), I clicked on ‘Slip Opinion: Todesstrafe’ at the German American Law Blog. Instead of the entry, the following appeared on my screen:

Kein Zugang aus impressumspflichtigen Staaten
Impressumspflicht verletzt US-Recht

Sollten Sie versehentlich über einen Dienst aus einem Staat mit Impressumspflicht hier gelandet sein, doch nicht aus einem Staat mit Impressumspflicht stammen, klicken Sie hier zum Besuch von German American Law Journal in Washington, DC, USA.

Impressumspflicht is hard to translate, isn’t it? Anyway, I live in Germany and I come from the UK, and both of those states are members of the EU. It’s widely believed that the Impressum is German law, but in fact it’s EU law (see my archives). So I am not allowed to access the German American Law Journal (German version) via its newsfeed. I am not sure why this is, though.

The first link took me to a Supreme Court decision, JOSEPH McINTYRE, executor of estate of MARGARET McINTYRE, deceased, PETITIONER v. OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION. Why do I have the feeling that this decision doesn’t apply to me because I’m not a US citizen?

I then – disobeying the rules – clicked through to the blog and found that slip opinion means vorläufige Begründung. Thanks!

The next thing I did was to see what happens if I click on a link to the English-language version of the German American Law Journal (there was an entry on Sunday). Well, what do you know – no nasty warning! But what about people from Ireland or the UK, or any other people from the EU who want to read that blog? It seems that only Germany and Austria are being banned here.

LATER NOTE: There is an explanation of the blocking at Die Blogelei.

I don’t like those Google ads that come up when you’re searching for some specific book and lead you to ebay or somewhere like that, where they tell you they haven’t got it. But the following is amusing: it appeared when I was looking at the law section of the Times Online

bq. Legal Profession Sale
New & used Legal Profession Check out the deals now!
www.eBay.com

It did produce a lot of Buy It Now ads, mainly for books, but no sale of The Legal Profession as such.

The Language Guy is a new weblog by Mike Geis, who describes himself as a retired linguist. To judge from his profile, he may write something about law and language.

bq. I wrote “The Language of Television Advertising,” “The Language of Politics,” and “Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction.” I also wrote and consulted on linguistic issues arising in such legal domains as trademark law, deceptive advertising, and jury instructions in death penalty cases.

(via Language hat, who had it from Aldiboronti at Wordorigins, which is always worth looking at)

There is terminology of professions and occupations regulated in the EU at this address. The terms are also translated (between French, German and English). The list appears to be new. Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein and Switzerland are also included, but not all the EU states’ terms are there, in particular those of the new states.

Of course, regulated professions is a narrow category. I looked at Rechtsanwalt. I would have thought it was not translated, since a Rechtsanwalt is a Rechtsanwalt. But no, it is translated into French as avocat and into English as lawyer/barrister. Why do solicitors not get a look in? Surely everyone knows solicitors’ exams are harder than barristers’? (I’d better close the comments). And then there are advocates. And Notare in Germany. Well, it is apparently the duty of the country involved to report the professions. Perhaps that hasn’t been done yet in the UK.

(Via Handakte WebLAWg)

End 2004 tauchte das Problem der Klingeltonabonnements in Großbritannien auf, jetzt scheint es gelöst – BBC-News-Artikel.

Mr Flynn said that the move to using subscriptions happened over the space of a few weeks at the end of 2004.

Websites such as grumbletext.co.uk started getting reports from customers who were racking up large bills for phone content they did not know they had signed up for.

“What made us uncomfortable was that these services were not being marketed transparently,” said Mr Flynn. “People did not know they were being offered a subscription service.”

Ein Verhaltenskodex wurde Mitte Januar eingeführt und konnte durchgesetzt werden.

The drafting of the new rules was led by the Mobile Entertainment Forum and the UK’s phone firms.

“Everyone is required to conform to this code of conduct,” said Andrew Bud, regulatory head of the MEF and executive chairman of messaging firm MBlox.

Interessant für Leser von Spreeblick und Kunden von Jamba.

Und jetzt eine Frage für eine Freundin, die ein neues Handy hat und gerne ein “normales” Klingeln hätte, und lieber was monophones. Ich habe zwar durch langwieriges Suchen ein “Klingeln – altes Telefon – brrrng brrrng” oder so ähnlich gefunden, aber wo findet man so einen Ton? Der Hersteller (Samsung) konnte nicht weiterhelfen.

The difficulties of translation, technical translation for example, are often understated. Here is one that only an expert could manage.

(Via Desbladet)