(click to enlarge)
Author Archives: MMarks
Best of the Blogs
Some kind person, possibly with the initials BW, has recommended Transblawg for Best of the Blogs (Deutsche Welle).
I know my entries are too long – it’s difficult for them to be otherwise in view of the subject matter – and on top of that blogging will probably be lighter in the next few weeks, so anyone who comes here expecting a display of quality is likely to be disappointed.
Past his sell-by date/Goleofriedhof
Hot coffee at Starbucks/Heißer Kaffee bei Starbucks
Overlawyered bespricht den Fall der Anwältin Alice Griffin, der jetzt Schadensersatz zugesprochen wurde ($310,000, aber beachte, die Summe wird vom Richter reduziert), weil ein Starbucks-Angestellte einen Becher mit Kaffee auf ihren Fuss fallen ließ.
(Umformuliert, da ursprünglich irreführend):
Dieser Fall ist anders als der Stella-Liebeck vs. McDonalds-Fall zu tu. Es handelt sich um einen Angestellten, der auf Alice Griffin Kaffee verschüttete und Verbrennungen verursachte. Wer der Meinung ist, die Stella-Liebeck-Geschichte hätte in Deutschland nicht stattfinden können (was allerdings nicht sicher ist), kann das jedenfalls von dem Alice-Griffin-Fall nicht behaupten, auch wenn die Schadensersatzsumme kleiner gewesen wäre.
The New York attorney Alice Griffin has been awarded $310,000 damages – but it’s reported that the judge is reducing the sum – because a negligent Starbucks employee dropped coffee on her foot, and because the coffee was so hot and the victim’s socks, sneakers and stockings held the heat in and so permanent damage was caused to the victim’s foot. No-one suggested the coffee was too hot. This is certainly not a case of ‘only in America’ – it could even have happened in Germany. If I carelessly drop a burning log on someone’s foot, I’m liable, and there’s no discussion about how hot the flames were.
See Overlawyered (Ted Frank) for a good analysis and comparison with the Liebeck case (which I mentioned here).
It seems unfortunate that Alice Griffin had to be burned with coffee. If it had only been tea, we could have avoided the outcry in the press that has probably only just begun.
(Via Jurabilis)
Purple carrots/Urmöhre trifft Karotte
German has a number of regional terms for many vegetables. I’m conscious of now saying Orange instead of Apfelsine, or wondering what to call a turnip. I usually say Karotte, but I hear Möhre here too for carrots, Mohrrübe less often and gelbe Rübe not at all, but perhaps in Munich.
But these purple carrots (from Texas, I think, a cross between old purple carrots and newer orange ones) are labelled Urmöhre trifft Karotte. It’s as if Möhre were the older word (before the 10th century – Morchel started as a diminutive of it) and Karotte the alien upstart (borrowed before the 16th century from Dutch, which had it from French and Latin – etymology from Kluge). I don’t know in which century carrots went orange, though. I remember Madhur Jaffrey or maybe Claudia Roden referring to a bleeding Indian carrot, and not as a term of abuse.


Phone-in prize shows/TV-Gewinnspiele eventuell ungesetzlich in England?
Times Online reports that phone-in prize shows may be closed or run as lotteries.
Apparently any game that charges a fee to play and does not involve skill is a lottery. And to run a lottery, you have to get a licence and give 20 per cent of the revenue to charity.
The current games are allowed to call themselves prize competitions if there is an alternative method of playing free of charge, without exorbitant phone charges. There is an alternative method – playing over the Internet – but this possibly is not advertised enough.
bq. The Gambling Commission could try to shut down the channels for potentially breaking the 1976 Lotteries and Amusements Act. However, its latest consultation document, Prize Competitions and Free Draws, indicates that laws due in September next year are much tougher.
bq. It says: Many of the commercial schemes which currently operate as competitions are, in the commissions view, [complex lotteries]. Good examples are the TV quiz shows on dedicated channels . . . All such channels will either have to stop operating altogether or operate under the provisions relating to lotteries or ensure that they operate such that they fall within the provisions relating to either prize competitions or free draws set out below.
I imagine the situation is similar in Germany.
phone-in prize show: die Call-in-Show
prize competition: Preisausschreiben